3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Talk about all things CNC
fishtoprecords
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:43 pm

3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by fishtoprecords » Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:30 am

I am not sure that I understand the difference between 2.5D milling and and 3D. Is there a clear difference, or is the difference as fuzzy as my understanding?

Gadgetman!
Posts: 1061
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:44 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by Gadgetman! » Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:57 am

The big difference is that on 'real 3D' you can undercut features or make holes that are not vertical.
Weird guy...
Shapeoko 2014F: 1000mm X/Y, 300W Quiet Cut spindle, Arduino Uno/G-shield and GRBL 0.9i
15x30 drag chains, custom spindle mount, 9mm belts, 8mm endplates, 6mm motor plates.

PsyKo
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:42 pm
Location: France

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by PsyKo » Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:52 am

Basically, you can do 2.5D with a 3 axis machine, and 3D with a 4 axis (or more) machine.
As mentioned by GadgetMan! 3D allows undercut.

But you can achieve 3D milling with a 3 axis machine by turning the piece being milled (with fixtures for instance). But it requires more work and precision.
Shapeoko #736
Kress 800, Z Axis upgrade, dual Y, 600mm X&Y rails, metal spacers and V Wheels, home switches, 4th axis
Goko - Free CNC Control Software - http://www.shapeoko.com/forum/viewtopic ... 380#p44380

twforeman
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:51 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Contact:

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by twforeman » Fri Apr 11, 2014 1:09 pm

The way I define it when I am talking about CAM software (and have always heard it defined) is that 2-1/2D means making flat bottomed pockets and profiles.

3D means full surface profiling. Not undercuts.

Doing undercuts requires a 4 (or more) Axis machine, but is still called 3D.
Ender 3 3D Printer
ShapeOko v3 serial #0004 - upgrade thread
All of my ShapeOko related blog posts

janapriya
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:50 am

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by janapriya » Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:00 pm

fishtoprecords wrote:I am not sure that I understand the difference between 2.5D milling and and 3D. Is there a clear difference, or is the difference as fuzzy as my understanding?
In general 2.5D is a sub domain of 3D. Roughly, 2.5D we have the complete control over X, Y and but half control over Z axis. In milling it is physically impossible to reach certain regions (undercuts), along Z axis, given we have material left towards the bit.
Attachments
2.5Dvs3D.png
2.5Dvs3D.png (9.76 KiB) Viewed 1917 times

cvoinescu
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:50 pm
Location: Camberley, UK
Contact:

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by cvoinescu » Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:32 pm

I'm with twforeman on this one. 2.5D is to 3D like a poster print is to a full color print. With 2.5D, you can have features at various depths, but all have flat tops and bottoms. With 3D, you can have arbitrary shapes (although only a subset can be milled on a 3-axis machine). A 2.5D object can be described by a small number of 2D drawings, each corresponding to a set Z depth. A 3D object requires a true 3D file format.
Proud owner of ShapeOko #709, eShapeOko #0, and of store.amberspyglass.co.uk

Threefer
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:02 pm

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by Threefer » Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:55 pm

I always thought it was as twforeman and cvoinescu describe it. You can also do shallow undercuts on a 3 axis machine using a ball end cutter with a smaller shank than the ball.
Image

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
---------------------------------------------------
Shapeoko# 3456, Makita RT0701c. Stock size for now but have 13"x13" travel by trimming down belt clamps and lip on smooth idler. Dovetailed wooden track clamping setup. Dust shoe in works.

edwardrford
Posts: 1250
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:40 pm
Location: Dixon, IL
Contact:

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by edwardrford » Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:25 pm

pacman.png
pacman.png (63.24 KiB) Viewed 1877 times
-Edward
Shapeoko 1 #0 - a couple of upgrades.
Shapeoko 2 #0 - a couple of upgrades.
Shapeoko 3 #2 - Stock

janapriya
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:50 am

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by janapriya » Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:15 am

Good one! :D

Threefer
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:02 pm

Re: 3d vs 2.5d, is it well defined?

Post by Threefer » Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:57 am

Awesome.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
---------------------------------------------------
Shapeoko# 3456, Makita RT0701c. Stock size for now but have 13"x13" travel by trimming down belt clamps and lip on smooth idler. Dovetailed wooden track clamping setup. Dust shoe in works.

Post Reply